Why the study?
Does Zone 2.5 TEVAR improve procedural success and aortic remodeling in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection requiring zone 2 landing?
Does Zone 2.5 TEVAR improve procedural success and aortic remodeling in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection requiring zone 2 landing?
The novel Zone 2.5 TEVAR technique may be an effective and reproducible option for treating complicated type B aortic dissection in patients with limited proximal sealing zones, avoiding the need for left subclavian artery revascularization.
May support Zone 2.5 TEVAR feasibility in limited sealing zones; leaves open prospective validation in complicated type B aortic dissection.
We report a novel thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) technique for complicated type B aortic dissection requiring zone 2 landing. A 42-year-old man presented with pulseless left femoral artery. Emergency TEVAR was performed using the left subclavian artery (LSA) wall as a sealing zone to reduce the risk of endoleak. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 8. CT demonstrated complete coverage of the entry tear, false lumen thrombosis, and preserved left subclavian perfusion. Follow-up CT showed favorable remodeling. This technique may be effective in patients with limited proximal sealing zones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashiguchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: