Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 10, 2026Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension

Cuffless blood pressure in 2025: from promise to practice: a narrative review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Cuffless BP devices support trend monitoring but lack sufficient accuracy to replace validated cuff measurements.

Why the study?

Cuffless BP technologies have expanded rapidly, but clinicians face mixed signals regarding their accuracy, calibration stability, and appropriate clinical use.

Design

Narrative review

Authors

FWFarah WehbeUniversity of OttawaSHSwapnil Hiremath

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Upholds caution on diagnostic use; leaves open need for standardized dynamic validation trials.

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the accuracy, utility, and emerging standards of cuffless blood pressure technologies.
  • Synthesis of current evidence on cuffless blood pressure technologies
  • Analysis of recent regulatory milestones and consumer adoption
  • Evaluation of new validation frameworks for cuffless devices
  • Review of special population considerations affecting accuracy and equity
  • Cuffless devices provide reliable trends but require periodic calibration for accuracy.
  • Recent validation frameworks emphasize the need for dynamic testing across various conditions.
  • Studies indicate moderate agreement between cuffless and traditional measurements.
  • Special populations present unique challenges for accuracy and equitable use.

Structured PICO

I
Intervention
Cuffless blood pressure technologies/wearables
C
Comparator
Validated upper-arm cuff measurements

Cuffless blood pressure wearables are currently suitable as adjuncts for tracking trends but require confirmation with validated upper-arm cuffs for diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Limitations

  • moderate agreement with cuffs
  • limited outcomes data
  • accuracy and equity concerns in special populations (chronic kidney disease/dialysis, pregnancy, pediatrics/frail, diverse skin tones)

Cite This Study

Wehbe et al. (2025) studied this question. Cuffless blood pressure devices can support trend monitoring but should not replace validated methods for diagnosis or treatment decisions due to accuracy concerns.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6963221491e05aa366cb8890https://doi.org/10.1097/mnh.0000000000001150

Topics

Persistent AF managementAtrial fibrillation
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Validating cuffless continuous blood pressure monitoring devices2023 · 66 citations
  2. 2Wearable cuffless blood pressure tracking: when will they be good enough?2024 · 23 citations
  3. 3Cuffless Blood Pressure Devices2022 · 57 citations
  4. 4The Microsoft Research Aurora Project: Important Findings on Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement2022 · 80 citations
  5. 5O32 AVAILABILITY OF PROPERLY VALIDATED BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN: STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW2024