Key result
Sternal closure during AVR or CABG links to a ~23% deterioration in RV free wall strain.
Why the study?
Right ventricular function changes after on-pump cardiac surgery, but the impact of the specific surgical procedure is largely unexplored.
Does the type of on-pump cardiac surgery (CABG vs AVR) differentially impact intraoperative right ventricular function?
Does the type of on-pump cardiac surgery (CABG vs AVR) differentially impact intraoperative right ventricular function?
Intraoperative right ventricular free wall strain deteriorates significantly after sternal closure, with a similar impact observed in both on-pump CABG and AVR surgeries.
May warrant closer intraoperative RV monitoring after sternal closure; leaves open prognostic value and outcome impact.
Background: Right ventricular (RV) function changes after on-pump cardiac surgery but the impact of the surgical procedure is largely unexplored. For this purpose, we aimed to describe the changes of RV function through the intraoperative period by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients scheduled for isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or for isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: Thirty patients each scheduled for on-pump CABG and for isolated surgical AVR were included into this prospective observational study. TEE was performed intraoperatively after induction of anesthesia [T1], after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass [T2], and after sternal closure [T3]. Echocardiographic evaluation included the assessment of RV fractional area change (FAC), RV ejection fraction (RVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and RV free wall strain (FWS). Results: Although there was no significant difference in RVEF and FAC before and immediately after bypass, TAPSE decreased significantly. In contrast, FWS remained unchanged in the same period (−22.7% (IQR −18.9 to −29.6) v −22.1% (IQR −17.1 to −26.1), P = 1). After sternal closure [T2 v T3], there was a significant deterioration of FWS (−22.1% (IQR −17.1 to −26.1) v −17.1% (IQR −13.3 to −21.7), P < 0.001). In the same interval, the values of RVEF, FAC, and TAPSE remained unchanged. These alterations in RV contractile pattern were observed in both groups of patients. Conclusion: There was no difference in the change of RV contractile pattern after on-pump CABG and AVR surgery, suggesting similar impact of both procedures on RV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foit et al. (2025) studied this question. After aortic valve replacement or CABG surgery, right ventricular free wall strain deteriorated significantly from −22.1% to −17.1% (P < 0.001) post-sternal closure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: