Key result
Pre-transplant CMV reassessment achieves high adherence but detects only ~2% seroconversion in kidney candidates.
Why the study?
The feasibility, optimal timing, and seroconversion incidence of CMV serostatus reassessment before kidney transplantation have not been systematically examined to prevent misclassification.
What is the program adherence to CMV serostatus reassessment and the incidence of seroconversion in initially CMV seronegative kidney transplant candidates?
What is the program adherence to CMV serostatus reassessment and the incidence of seroconversion in initially CMV seronegative kidney transplant candidates?
Program adherence to CMV serostatus reassessment within 6 months of kidney transplant was high, revealing a low incidence of seroconversion while on the waitlist.
High adherence supports reassessment program feasibility in kidney candidates; leaves open necessity of routine monitoring given low seroconversion.
Background Recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus reassessment proximate to transplant for initially CMV seronegative patients is critical to guide post‐transplant CMV preventive strategies in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), since seroconversion during the long wait‐list time could lead to CMV serostatus misclassification. The feasibility and optimal timing of CMV serostatus reassessment and the incidence of seroconversion have not been systematically examined. Methods Program adherence to a guideline for CMV serology reassessment within 6 months of transplant among initially CMV seronegative adults undergoing a first kidney transplant between December 17, 2022 and December 17, 2024 was retrospectively assessed. The association of baseline and transplant factors with adherence was compared by chi‐square or Fisher's exact test ( p < 0.05 considered significant). The incidence of CMV seroconversion between the time of listing and transplant was calculated per person‐years of follow‐up. Results Among 823 adult KTR, 586 (71.2%) were eligible and 127 (21.7%) were CMV seronegative at listing. The median (interquartile range) time to transplant was longer for deceased (5.23 [2.86–7.44] years) than living donor KTR (1.51 [0.76–2.74] years). Program adherence was 91.3% (116/127) overall and higher among living (65/65 [100%]) versus deceased donor transplants (51/62 [82.3%]), p < 0.01). No demographic or transplant‐related variables were associated with adherence ( p > 0.05 for all variables). Seroconversion between listing and transplant occurred in two of 124 patients (1.6%), an incidence of 0.0043 per person‐year of follow‐up. Conclusion Program adherence to CMV serostatus reassessment within 6 months of transplant was high in a clinical setting and identified a low incidence of seroconversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pama‐Ghuman et al. (2025) studied this question. CMV serostatus reassessment within 6 months of transplant had 91.3% adherence, identifying a low seroconversion incidence of 1.6% in kidney transplant candidates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: