What does this research mean for the field?

This scoping review aims to evaluate and synthesize approaches to assessing suicidality in psychiatric clinical trials. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the methods and variables used in assessing suicidality in psychiatric trials.

January 10, 2026Systematic Reviews0 citationsOpen Access

The assessment of suicidality in psychiatric trials: a protocol for a scoping review

PFPascal FaltermeierUniversity of Southern Denmark SJSophie JuulUniversity of Copenhagen FSFaiza SiddiquiCopenhagen University Hospital

Key Result

This scoping review aims to evaluate and synthesize approaches to assessing suicidality in psychiatric clinical trials.

Key Points

To evaluate the methods and variables used in assessing suicidality in psychiatric trials.
Prospective registration of the review on the COMET website.
Examination of existing protocols and guidelines regarding suicidality assessment.
Identification of relevant studies and outcomes related to suicidality in psychiatric trials.
Current assessment methods and protocols for suicidality are varied and inconsistent.
Need for standardized approaches in evaluating suicidality in psychiatric trials.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%

Abstract

This scoping review is part of a project that has been prospectively registered on the COMET website (https://comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/3125).

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper