PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 10, 2018Frontiers in Psychology558 citationsOpen Access

Collective Trauma and the Social Construction of Meaning

View Full Paper
GHGilad Hirschberger

Key Points

  • To systematically delineate the psychological and sociological processes through which collective trauma transforms into collective memory and enduring meaning systems for affected groups.
  • Conceptual synthesis of social psychological mechanisms linking catastrophic historical events to collective memory and identity reconstruction.
  • Comparative analysis of identity threat management and narrative construction between victim and perpetrator groups across generations.
  • Victim groups utilize trauma memory adaptively for survival, constructing transgenerational identities to counter elevated existential threat.
  • Perpetrator groups address identity threats via memory minimization, denial, historical closure, or reframing past wrongdoing to emphasize positive contemporary group actions.
  • Meaning-making following collective trauma operates as an ongoing internal and external negotiation that drives memory debates while establishing potential frameworks for intergroup understanding.

Abstract

Collective trauma is a cataclysmic event that shatters the basic fabric of society. Aside from the horrific loss of life, collective trauma is also a crisis of meaning. The current paper systematically delineates the process that begins with a collective trauma, transforms into a collective memory, and culminates in a system of meaning that allows groups to redefine who they are and where they are going. For victims, the memory of trauma may be adaptive for group survival, but also elevates existential threat, which prompts a search for meaning, and the construction of a trans-generational collective self. For perpetrators, the memory of trauma poses a threat to collective identity that may be addressed by denying history, minimizing culpability for wrongdoing, transforming the memory of the event, closing the door on history, or accepting responsibility. The acknowledgment of responsibility often comes with disidentification from the group. The dissonance between historical crimes and the need to uphold a positive image of the group may be resolved, however, in another manner; it may prompt the creation of a new group narrative that acknowledges the crime and uses it as a backdrop to accentuate the current positive actions of the group. For both victims and perpetrators, deriving meaning from trauma is an ongoing process that is continuously negotiated within groups and between groups; it is responsible for debates over memory, but also holds the promise of providing a basis for intergroup understanding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gilad Hirschberger (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69634fb765523d25b94895d6https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01441
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper