Oil spills remain among the most severe anthropogenic threats to marine ecosystems, with consequences that span ecological, socio-economic, and human health domains. While numerous studies have investigated individual accidents such as Exxon Valdez, Prestige, and Deepwater Horizon, systematic comparative analyses across multiple large-scale incidents remain limited. This review addresses this critical gap by synthesizing findings from fourteen major oil spills worldwide. It examines the roles of oil type and environmental conditions, emphasizing impacts on fish, seabirds, shoreline habitats, and benthic organisms, as well as on long-term ecosystem recovery. Across cases, coastal waters, shorelines, and benthic communities consistently emerged as the most impacted habitats, reflecting both the persistence of oil in nearshore environments and the challenges of long-term restoration. Biologically, all trophic levels were affected: plankton, fish, seabirds, and benthic invertebrates were highly vulnerable, while marine mammals and reptiles suffered population-level effects. By integrating cross-case evidence, this review highlights recurring patterns, key uncertainties, and long-lasting ecosystem disruptions that persist decades after acute events. The Deepwater Horizon spill stands out as the most ecologically severe incident, whereas earlier spills such as Exxon Valdez, Erika, and Prestige remain benchmarks for ecological damage. Thus, this state-of-the-art review provides the most comprehensive comparative assessment of oil spill impacts to date and offers technical recommendations for enhancing preparedness, response, and resilience in the face of future spills.
Kokkos et al. (Sun,) studied this question.