Abstract Background The emergence of antimicrobial resistance has complicated management of infections. We investigated whether empirical therapy discordant for chromosomal AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E) had a clinical impact before switching to definitive therapy in pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs). Methods A retrospective study was conducted at Tokyo Metropolitan Children’s Medical Center from July 2010 to January 2024. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 16 years with fever ≥ 38.0℃ and ≥ 10⁴ CFU/mL of AmpC-E in urine cultures. Exclusion criteria were pre-antibiotic defervescence, alternative diagnoses, or polymicrobial growth ( ≥ 3 species). Patients were classified into two groups. The discordant group received initial antibiotics considered ineffective for AmpC-E, such as penicillins or first to third generation cephalosporins. The concordant group received antibiotics generally recommended for AmpC-E, such as aminoglycosides or fourth generation cephalosporins or carbapenems. The primary outcome was time to defervescence. The secondary outcome was 30-day culture confirmed recurrence. Time to defervescence was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier curves. Results Of 135 cases identified, 76 met the inclusion criteria. The discordant and the concordant groups were 41 and 35, respectively. Median age was 6 months (IQR 4.8–16.8) in the discordant group and 8.4 months (IQR 4.8-33.6) in the concordant group. Common pathogens included Enterobacter cloacae (30%) and Klebsiella aerogenes (26%). Catheter-associated UTIs were 33%. Median time to defervescence was 16.9 hours (95% CI 5.8–28.0) in the discordant group and 20.5 hours (95% CI 17.1–23.9) in the concordant group, with no significant difference (p = 0.998) (Figure 1). 30-day culture confirmed recurrence occurred in one case each group. Conclusion In pediatric UTIs caused by AmpC-E, initial discordant therapy was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes, suggesting that unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics may be avoided in empirical treatment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Kanie et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: