PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-650. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clesrovimab for Protection against Infant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease in the United States

View Full Paper
KKKlodeta KuraJLJohn LangDWD Wang

Key Points

  • Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of clesrovimab for RSV prevention in US infants.
  • Decision tree model simulated clinical and economic impact of clesrovimab.
  • Compared with nirsevimab, palivizumab, and RSVpreF vaccine.
  • Used post-hoc trial data for efficacy estimates and sensitivity analyses.
  • Clesrovimab showed fewer RSV-related MALRI and was cost-saving compared to nirsevimab.
  • Cost estimates for clesrovimab compared to palivizumab ranged from $7,372 to $42,691 per QALY.
  • Projected total MALRI cost reductions for clesrovimab were between $33 million and $161 million.

Abstract

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes significant hospitalization burden. Clesrovimab is an investigational, long-acting monoclonal antibody in development for the prevention of RSV lower respiratory tract infection in infants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing clesrovimab in US infants born during or entering their first RSV season. Figure 1Number of MALRI estimated for (blue) palivizumab, (orange) RSVpreF, (grey) nirsevimab, and (yellow) clesrovimab. Figure 2Economic impact of (blue) palivizumab, (orange) RSVpreF, (grey) nirsevimab, and (yellow) clesrovimab. Methods A decision tree model simulated the clinical and economic impact of clesrovimab in infants, compared with three alternative interventions: nirsevimab, palivizumab, and RSVpreF vaccine. Model inputs were obtained from published literature. Efficacy estimate for clesrovimab resulted from a post-hoc analysis of the trial data, which was conducted to align endpoints from different studies. Health outcomes and costs (in 2024 USD) were evaluated from a societal perspective. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Various efficacy assumptions were examined as scenario analyses. Results Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the clinical and economic impacts of palivizumab, RSVpreF, nirsevimab, and clesrovimab. Clesrovimab resulted in fewer RSV-related medically attended lower respiratory infection (MALRI) outcomes and was cost-saving compared to nirsevimab, with significant reductions in total MALRI costs ranging from 33 million to 161 million. When compared to palivizumab and RSVpreF, clesrovimab was estimated to cost between 7, 372–42, 691 and 79, 366–134, 353 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. Results were sensitive to changes regarding intervention cost-per-dose parameters, efficacy assumptions, and QALY loss due to RSV infection. Conclusion Based on listed parameters a single dose of clesrovimab can significantly reduce the burden of RSV among US infants and lead to cost-savings compared to nirsevimab. Disclosures Klodeta Kura, PhD, MSD: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) John C. Lang, PhD, MSc, MSc, BSc, Merck Canada Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Dawei Wang, PhD, Merck: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Yoonyoung Choi, PhD, MS, RPh, Merck & Co. , Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Merck & Co. , Inc.: Employment|Merck & Co. , Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Michelle Goveia, MD, Merck: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Anushua Sinha, MD, Merck & Co. , Inc. , Rahway, NJ, USA: Employment|Merck & Co. , Inc. , Rahway, NJ, USA: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Yao-Hsuan Chen, PhD, MSD: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Elamin Elbasha, Ph. D. , Merck & Co. , Inc.: Employee|Merck & Co. , Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kura et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e72413bf7a6f02bff80dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.863
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper