PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-1183. Analysis of Cefiderocol use at an Academic Medical Center and Associated Patient Outcomes

View Full Paper
SRSamantha RaushMPMichelle PotterEKEmir Kobic

Key Points

  • Evaluate the use of cefiderocol for treating multidrug-resistant infections and its impact on patient outcomes.
  • Retrospective chart review of patients receiving cefiderocol at BUMCP from January 2023 to July 2024.
  • Assessment of clinical appropriateness, timing of initiation, and microbiological susceptibilities.
  • Evaluation of outcomes including 30-day mortality, re-infection, and readmission.
  • Cefiderocol used primarily for CRE (63%) and CRAB (12%) infections.
  • 30-day mortality highest in CRAB infections (33%), consistent with prior findings.
  • Cefiderocol was the definitive therapy in 68% of cases, with median initiation at 3 days post-culture.

Abstract

Abstract Background Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative organisms. Banner University Medical Center – Phoenix (BUMCP) restricts cefiderocol use to specific MDR pathogens. Concerns exist about delayed initiation of cefiderocol due to limited rapid diagnostics, which may adversely affect patient outcomes.Table 1.Patient DemographicsTable 2.Microbiology Results*Some patients were positive for multiple organisms Methods A retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients receiving ≥1 dose of cefiderocol from January 2023 to July 2024 at BUMCP was conducted. Patients were evaluated for clinical appropriateness of cefiderocol use, timing of initiation, microbiological susceptibilities, and outcomes including 30-day mortality, re-infection, and readmission.Table 3.OutcomesDTR, difficult to treat; CRE, carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales; CRAB, carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii spp.; IQR, interquartile range; ICU, intensive care unit; UTI, urinary tract infection; SSTI, skin and soft tissue infection; CNS, central nervous system; MDRO, multidrug resistant organism; ID, infectious disease;*Patients not included in the rest of the table include those with S. maltophilia, non-MDROs, or no growth on cultures Results Seventy-six patients were included. Cefiderocol was used primarily for CRE (63%) and CRAB (12%) infections. Most patients (96%) met BUMCP restriction criteria. Cefiderocol was used as definitive therapy in 68% of cases, with a median initiation time of 3 days post-culture. ID was consulted in 99% of cases. Thirty-day mortality was highest in CRAB infections (33%), consistent with CREDIBLE-CR trial findings. Susceptibility to cefiderocol was confirmed in 86% of organisms tested. Delays in susceptibility testing and inconsistent reporting of preferred agent susceptibilities were identified. Conclusion Cefiderocol use at BUMCP is largely appropriate and reserved for high-risk MDR infections. Delayed initiation, often beyond the 48–72-hour window studied in clinical trials, may contribute to worse outcomes, particularly in CRAB infections. Implementation of routine CARBA-5 testing and reflex susceptibility panels may improve timely initiation. Further studies are needed to assess impact of diagnostic improvements on outcomes. Disclosures Emir Kobic, BCIDP, Shionogi: Honoraria

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raush et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e72413bf7a6f02bff8c5https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.1376
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper