Background and Objectives: Secondary bacterial infection drives poor outcomes in older adults with COVID-19, but age-specific microbiology and its interaction with severity scores are not well defined. We characterized respiratory and pleural pathogens, resistance profiles, and their impact on day-5 SOFA/APACHE II in octogenarians versus younger adults. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with RT-PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at a tertiary infectious diseases center (≥80 years, n = 152; <65 years, n = 327). Respiratory and pleural samples were processed according to EUCAST standards. Identification employed matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Pathogen distributions, susceptibilities, and rates of superimposed pneumonia, empyema, and bacteremia were compared by age, and associations between secondary pneumonia, day-5 SOFA/APACHE II, and 28-day mortality were analyzed. Results: Sputum was obtained in 67.1% of older and 65.7% of younger adults, with numerically higher culture positivity in older patients (73.5% vs. 65.1%). Pathogen spectra were similar, dominated by Streptococcus pneumoniae (24.0% vs. 24.3%), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (18.7% vs. 20.7%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (9.3% vs. 6.4%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains. Empyema was more frequent in octogenarians (7.9% vs. 3.1%), and pleural cultures were usually positive. Meropenem retained 100% activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas in both strata. In ≥80-year-olds, superimposed pneumonia was associated with higher day-5 SOFA (6.6 vs. 5.5) and APACHE II (24.3 vs. 21.0) scores and markedly increased 28-day mortality (37.5% vs. 9.8%). Conclusions: In octogenarians with COVID-19, secondary bacterial pneumonia and empyema are frequent, microbiologically similar to younger adults, and strongly amplify organ dysfunction and mortality even with largely preserved carbapenem susceptibility.
Daliu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: