Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The analysis reveals nepotism undermines role legitimacy in organisations, suggesting a need for enhanced psychological safety and trust.
This paper introduces the concept of Nepotism Without Shame to explain how relational hiring increasingly replaces professional legitimacy in contemporary Western organisations. Rather than framing nepotism as favouritism or corruption of intent, it shows how leaders operating under pressure substitute familiarity for judgement as a survival strategy. Drawing on behavioural ethics, organisational culture, and psychological safety research, the paper analyses how relational trust displaces role-legitimacy, how loyalty networks shield harm, and why high-vulnerability sectors such as disability and community care are particularly exposed. The paper concludes by outlining structural interventions required to restore legitimacy, protect ethical voice, and separate trust from appointment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerard Bruijl (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: