Analysis reveals air-launch efficiency enhances propulsive efficiency and energy economics in atmospheric exit strategies.
This paper analyzes atmospheric exit strategies within the Webb Mechanical Metric (WMM) framework, comparing vertical rocket launch profiles against gradual air-launched trajectories. Using the fundamental drag equation and FRE (Free Range Electron) field density modeling, we demonstrate that gravity losses in vertical launches (1,500–2,000 m/s) dramatically exceed drag losses in gradual exits (50–150 m/s). Air-launch platforms that utilize aerodynamic lift to reach stratospheric altitudes bypass approximately 70% of atmospheric mass before rocket ignition, fundamentally altering the energy economics of orbital insertion. The analysis reveals that current launch paradigms optimize for the wrong variable—minimizing drag when gravity loss dominates the delta-v budget. A gradual pitch-over profile starting from altitude achieves lower peak dynamic pressure (Max Q), reduced thermal stress, and superior propulsive efficiency, suggesting that air-launched gradual exit represents the mechanically optimal path to orbit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matt Webb (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: