PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Discover Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Exploring a biocentric LLM-based assistant in environmental decision-making with more-than-human representation of the Tagus Estuary

View Full Paper
RFR. H. FelixInstituto Politécnico de LisboaFCFilipa CorreiaUniversity of LisbonCPCristiano Pedroso-RoussadoInstituto Politécnico de Lisboa

Key Points

  • The research investigates how LLMs can integrate nonhuman perspectives in decision-making processes.
  • Developed a biocentric AI assistant by training an LLM on ecological data about the Tagus Estuary.
  • Conducted an experimental study comparing biocentric and anthropocentric assistants in a decision-making task.
  • Focused on the location decision for a new university campus.
  • Biocentric assistant did not significantly alter final decisions of participants.
  • Prompted increased reflection on environmental considerations in participants' justifications.

Abstract

Abstract Integrating nonhuman perspectives into human decision-making is crucial for addressing environmental challenges, yet practical methods are scarce. This paper explores using Large Language Models (LLMs) to represent nonhuman entities and influence human decisions toward ecological sustainability. We address two research questions: (1) How can LLMs be instructed to represent nonhuman entities? (2) How does a biocentric AI assistant affect people’s decision-making? We developed a biocentric AI assistant by training an LLM on ecological data about a specific estuary. In an experimental study, we compared this biocentric assistant with an anthropocentric counterpart in a speculative decision-making task involving the location of a new university campus. Results show that while the biocentric assistant did not significantly change participants’ final decisions, it prompted increased reflection on environmental considerations in their justifications. Our findings demonstrate AI’s potential and challenges in incorporating nonhuman perspectives into decision-making, contributing to more-than-human HCI, and promoting sustainable outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Felix et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f31d13bf7a6f02c00d04https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02474-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Synocene, Beyond the Anthropocene: De-Anthropocentralising Human-Nature-AI Interaction2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis2019 · 19,004 citations
  3. 3Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is Made2024 · 30 citations
  4. 4Imagining Sustainable Futures: Expanding the Discussion on Sustainable HCI2024 · 19 citations
  5. 5The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature2004 · 3,001 citations