In Guangxi, China, the area used to plant sugarcane is growing in order to meet the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan’s objective of sugar self-sufficiency (2021–2025). Comprehensive soil heavy metal data are necessary for growing area expansion in order to inform farmers and policymakers. Here, we analyzed soil samples from ten sugarcane-growing counties/districts of Guangxi by employing four different risk assessment indices. Our results indicate that the studied soils are moderately to strongly acidic and are deficient in soil organic matter ( 3) across all regions and Pb and As contamination ranging from moderate to severe, particularly in Jiangzhou district. Contrastingly, Cd and Hg showed no significant enrichment (Igeo < 0) relative to the local background, though their sources require further investigation. The potential ecological risk assessment showed a high risk, specifically from As in Jiangzhou district, which was the only area showing a moderate comprehensive potential ecological risk. A significant positive correlation was found between the total and bioavailable contents of all five heavy metals, whereas soil pH and organic matter were significantly negatively correlated with the bioavailability of Cr and Pb, but positively correlated with As and Hg. The availability of Cd, however, was independent of pH and OM, suggesting the influence of other, unmeasured geochemical factors. These results highlight specific and localized environmental risks that may require targeted management to ensure agricultural safety, ecosystem health, and sustainable sugarcane production.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yawei Luo
Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science
Cuifang Yang
Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science
Shan Zhou
Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science
Agronomy
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science
Yibin University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luo et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f32713bf7a6f02c00ec4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020185
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: