PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-409. Use of Point of Care Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Resource and Clinician Perceptions

View Full Paper
JGJennifer E GirottoUniversity of ConnecticutIWIlana WaynikConnecticut Children's Medical Center

Key Points

  • The project aimed to evaluate the impact of a point of care app on pediatric antimicrobial prescribing practices.
  • Quality improvement project reviewed by IRB
  • FLPOC app introduced in stages
  • Surveys conducted before and after FLPOC implementation
  • Respondents included various healthcare providers
  • 219 providers responded pre-implementation and 141 responded post-implementation
  • Clinical pathways usage increased from 47% to 70% after app introduction
  • Ease of access to antimicrobial information improved substantially across all areas examined

Abstract

Abstract Background The objective of this project was to assess the impact of Firstline, a unique point of care app (FLPOC) for local antibiogram-based antimicrobial prescribing recommendations, on inpatient and outpatient providers. Methods This project was reviewed by the IRB and deemed a quality improvement project. FLPOC was rolled out in stages between month, year and month, year. A survey was developed and emailed to providers at a 205 bed freestanding children’s hospital and to outpatient satellite and referral network providers. Respondents included physicians, advanced practice providers, pharmacists, nurses, and trainees. The survey was sent out in June 2021 prior to FLPOC implementation (BL) and again 40 months after implementation (POST) in November 2024. The survey asked for provider demographics and gaged ease of access of pediatric infectious disease prescribing information i.e., infections for which the institution has clinical pathways (PATH), inpatient infections without clinical pathways (NP-I), outpatient infections without clinical pathways (NP-O). In POST period, providers were additionally asked their frequency of use of the FLPOC app and for recommendations on how to improve the app. Results 219 and 141 providers responded to the BL and POST surveys respectively. Attending physicians were the most frequent respondents. The top 3 resources used by providers BL and POST implementation included the institution’s clinical pathways (47% BL and 70% POST), Lexicomp (53% BL and 66% POST), FLPOC (51% POST) versus Uptodate (59% BL). For ease of access to antimicrobial information, those that reported extremely easy or very easy improved across all areas (PATH: 44% BL vs 70% POST, NP-I: 15% BL vs 31% POST, NP-O: 26% BL vs 39% POST). The majority of providers used FLPOC at least once or twice monthly. Qualitative data in a comments section was overwhelmingly positive. Recommendations included suggestions to increase provider awareness of the product. Conclusion Implementation of FLPOC was highly successful in improving easy access to local antimicrobial stewardship prescribing recommendations. Feedback from providers suggests need for additional education to ensure all providers are familiar with the product. Disclosures Jennifer E. Girotto, PharmD, BCPPS, BCIDP, Wolters Kluwer: Advisor/Consultant

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Girotto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33213bf7a6f02c01095https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper