PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

A Target Trial Emulation of Short vs Long Antibiotic Duration for the New Definition of Uncomplicated UTI

View Full Paper
MSMatthew SteinbergerMichigan State UniversityTGTejal GandhiUniversity of MichiganDRDavid RatzVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Key Points

  • To evaluate clinical outcomes of short versus long antibiotic treatment duration for uncomplicated UTIs under new guidelines.
  • Employed a target trial emulation framework for analysis.
  • Collected data from 68 hospitals in Michigan between 11/2021 and 11/2024.
  • Compared short (3-5 days) to long (6-14 days) antibiotic durations for primary and secondary outcomes.
  • 24.8% of hospitalized UTI patients met the new uUTI definition.
  • No significant difference in 30-day recurrent UTI between treatment durations.
  • Short duration led to fewer antibiotic-related adverse events.

Abstract

Abstract Background IDSA complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) guidelines posted for public comment now define cUTI as infection beyond the bladder. This change categorizes many patients previously considered cUTI as uncomplicated (uUTI), making more patients appropriate for short antibiotic treatment. We sought to assess differences in clinical outcomes for the short vs long treatment durations in patients meeting the new uUTI definition. Methods From 11/2021 to 11/2024, data (e.g., patient characteristics, lab results, clinical outcomes) were collected in patients with a UTI at 68 hospitals in Michigan. We used a target trial emulation framework to assess treatment duration in patients meeting the new uUTI definition using a clone and censor approach. Short (3 - 5 days) vs long (6 - 14 days) antibiotic duration was compared for the primary outcome of 30-day recurrent UTI, as well as secondary clinical outcomes. Outcomes were adjusted via inverse probability of censor weights. Randomization occurred on treatment day 3. Patients were excluded if they received 3 or 14 days of effective antibiotics, or if they had signs/symptoms of infection beyond the bladder (e.g., fever, bacteremia, pyelonephritis), catheter-associated UTI, recent urologic surgery or obstruction. Results Of 13,784 patients hospitalized with a UTI, 24.8% (N=1854) met the new uUTI definition and were eligible. 19.8% (N=368) were men Table 1. Under half (45.4%; n=841) were treated with a short antibiotic duration. Patients treated with short vs long duration had similar comorbidities, including Charlson Comorbidity Index. The most common empiric antibiotic used was ceftriaxone. After adjustment, there was no difference in 30-day recurrent UTI when comparing short vs long duration (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.45-1.17) Table 2. A short antibiotic duration was associated with a decreased risk of 30-day antibiotic-related adverse events. (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12-0.95). Conclusion Hospitalized patients meeting the new definition of uUTI treated with a short antibiotic duration had no difference in recurrent UTI compared to long duration, but short duration was associated with less antibiotic-associated adverse events. Our findings support the safety of shorter antibiotic durations for patients meeting the new definition of uUTI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steinberger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966f33213bf7a6f02c010dfhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper