Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative imaging compares 3D CZT and conventional SPECT/CT for Tb-161, suggesting 3D CZT's superiority.
Quantitative Tb-161 SPECT imaging can be performed using both a conventional and a 3D CZT SPECT/CT. Given its higher sensitivity, the 3D CZT system is preferred, as it achieved better image quality with an 8-min acquisition compared to a conventional system with a 16-min acquisition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuttens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: