Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work extends Lyapunov stability theory to clarify dynamics in transient systems, suggesting new insights into stability.
This work extends classical Lyapunov stability theory to systems in which time, admissibility, and objecthood are not guaranteed to persist. By introducing geometry-attached time, stability is formulated relative to the existence of an admissible regime rather than an assumed global clock. The framework clarifies phenomena such as stable chaos, stable irregular dynamics, and learning under nonstationary or ephemeral conditions, where Lyapunov inequalities may hold locally while asymptotic reasoning fails due to loss of regime validity. The notion of ephemeral objecthood is introduced to distinguish instability of dynamics from collapse of existence itself. Classical Lyapunov theory is preserved within its domain of validity; the contribution of this work is to make that domain explicit and to provide a minimal extension for systems governed by transient admissibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louis Nguyen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: