Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research reveals dynamic baryonic screening impacts the cosmological constant, suggesting new astrophysical features.
Baryonic Screening of the Cosmological Constant and MOND-like Phenomenology in Scale-Invariant Topology This research note derives a direct, falsifiable prediction of the Scale-Invariant Topology (SIT) framework. We propose that the cosmological constant (Λ) is not a universal invariant but a dynamic quantity subject to local screening by baryonic matter. Core Mechanism: In the SIT framework, vacuum energy represents the relaxation rate of geometric strain. Baryonic matter, modeled as high-frequency topological defects, acts as a "relaxation sink," locally suppressing the effective vacuum tension. We term this effect Baryonic Screening. Key Results & Predictions: Emergent MOND Dynamics: The spatial gradient of the screened vacuum pressure generates an effective acceleration force. This force naturally recovers the MOND acceleration scale (a₀) and the Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation (BTFR) without modifying the fundamental gravitational constant G or postulating dark matter particles. Relaxation Shadows: We predict that spiral arms in disk galaxies create localized "shadows" of reduced vacuum pressure. This leads to non-axisymmetric dynamical signatures and rotation curve features that correlate strictly with baryonic surface density, obeying Renzo’s Rule. ** macroscopic Casimir Effect:** The mechanism is mathematically analogous to a macroscopic gravitational Casimir effect, where matter boundaries restrict the available modes of vacuum relaxation. This work serves as the observational companion to the foundational paper "Scale-Invariant Topology (SIT): A Unified Topological Framework for Spatially-Driven Relaxation Dynamics", translating the Protocol 61 ontology into testable astrophysical signatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maxat Melsov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: