Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research introduces a multi-agent architecture to enhance decision-making processes in AI agents, indicating improvements in functionality.
This deposit contains a working research draft describing a multi-agent deliberation architecture for long-horizon sequential decision making in large language model–based agents. Using Zork I as a challenging interactive fiction testbed, the work argues that single-pass inference places excessive cognitive burden on a single model call, leading to looping behavior and poor arbitration between competing objectives. The paper proposes an explicit separation between proposal generation and decision selection through specialized mission agents, a dedicated explorer agent, and a distinct arbitration step. The contribution is architectural and methodological rather than performance-driven; results are preliminary and intended to motivate further investigation into long-horizon agent control, exploration–exploitation tradeoffs, and reasoning transparency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael D. Lane (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: