Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved Arabic spelling correction in a low-resource language, suggesting advances in error handling.
Purpose This study presents a robust Arabic spelling-correction model that simultaneously handles non-word errors and multiple categories of real-word errors. Arabic is a morphologically rich and relatively low-resource language, which makes end-to-end correction across diverse error types particularly challenging. Our work targets these challenges directly and addresses key gaps in current methodologies for Arabic spelling correction. Design/methodology/approach The study introduces a comprehensive training framework with dynamic error synthesis, which injects errors at sampling time so that each pass over the data produces fresh perturbations. The synthesized errors cover non-word, real-word, grammatical and punctuation categories. We train on a new corpus of 191,000+ news articles comprising 3.2 million sentences and formulate correction as a sequence-to-sequence supervised learning task using Transformer-based models. We evaluate several pretraining configurations, including BERT2BERT and BERT2GPT2 and quantify the benefits of transfer learning by comparing them against a baseline Seq2Seq Transformer trained from random initialization. Findings All pretrained models outperform their randomly initialized counterparts. The best configuration, BERT2GPT2, attains a word error rate of 6.86%, compared with 8.02% for the baseline, a reduction of 1.16%. The proposed system achieves state-of-the-art results on both QALB shared tasks. Originality/value To the best of our knowledge, this work provides the first large-scale, high-quality Arabic corpus accompanied by a scalable error-synthesis framework and a comprehensive transfer-learning study for spelling correction. We release a novel dataset comprising 3,221,524 samples. The dynamic error-synthesis pipeline systematically injects real-word, non-word, grammatical and punctuation errors, demonstrating practical applicability for training robust correction models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shannak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: