Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates geothermometry using chemical analysis in marble, suggesting new methods for temperature estimation.
The chemical compositions and formation temperatures of magnesian calcite and dolomite were estimated by using the combination of chemical analysis, crystallographic parameters, and a plethora of various diagrams and mathematical calculations. This study presents an example of the calculated crystallo-chemical formula (Ca0.960Mg0.039Fe0.001)CO3, obtained from chemical analysis on a representative marble sample from the Bukulja–Venˇcac area in central Serbia. Substituting CaCO3 with MgCO3 and FeCO3 in dolomite adds approximately 3–5 mol. %, enhancing the classification and indicating that it is more accurately identified as magnesium-excess dolomite. The estimated formation temperature of magnesian calcite (1) is approximately 528 ◦C, whereas magnesian calcite (2) forms at about 341 ◦C. The ~187 ◦C difference corresponds to ~3.28 mol. % MgCO3 (~7.18% dolomite), reflecting the distinction between magnesian calcite (1) and magnesian calcite (2). Considering the presence of the submicroscopic intergrowth and exsolution of dolomite within magnesian calcite (1), which are further subdivided in magnesian calcite (2), the estimated formation temperature of ~341 ◦C appears to be more realistic. The synthesis of the results suggests that this combined method could be helpful in the geothermometry of marble samples after the treatment with acetic acid. However, despite the promising results, additional experiments are necessary to validate the proposed modified geothermometry approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tančić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: