Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates AI-driven optimisation linking costs and throughput in mining, indicating efficiency improvements.
This study presents an integrated, cost-aware artificial intelligence (AI) meta-modelling framework for mine-to-mill optimisation that couples high-fidelity simulation with data-driven predictive modelling. Using over three million scenarios generated in the Integrated Extraction Simulator (IES), the framework quantifies how upstream design parameters such as burden, spacing, hole diameter, and explosive density propagate through screening, crushing, stockpiling, and grinding to affect downstream costs and throughput. Random Forest-based meta-models achieved predictive accuracies above 90%, enabling the rapid evaluation of technical and financial trade-offs across the mining value chain. Stage-wise cost models were formulated for drilling, blasting, comminution, and material handling to link process variables to costs per tonne. The results reveal clear non-linear cost responses: finer fragmentation reduces the total comminution cost despite higher explosive expenditure, while SAG mill load and speed exhibit U-shaped cost relationships with distinct optimal operating windows. By combining physics-based simulations, machine learning, and cost integration, the framework transforms traditional stage-wise optimisation into a holistic, financially informed decision-support system. The proposed methodology supports real-time, AI-enabled digital twins capable of adaptive mine-to-mill optimisation, paving the way for more efficient and sustainable resource extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nobahar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: