PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Education Sciences5 citationsOpen Access

Adaptive and Personalized Learning in Higher Education: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach

View Full Paper
JHJuan Roberto Hernández-HerreraJOJesus Ortiz-BejarJOJose Ortiz‐Bejar

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the integration of AI in enhancing personalized learning in higher education, particularly in developing contexts.
  • Diagnostic quantitative analysis using data from the National Survey on Access and Permanence in Education (ENAPE 2021) with 3422 students.
  • Exploratory Factor Analysis (KMO = 0.96) to establish a structural baseline of factors influencing educational perceptions.
  • Quasi-experimental pilot study with 23 students in Civil Engineering and Nutrition using a custom AI tool called ActivAI.
  • Strong correlation (r=0.72, p<0.01) between the perceived impact of education on daily life and equity perception.
  • High overall student satisfaction with AI-driven personalization (M = 4.49, SD = 0.64).
  • Disciplinary differences in student engagement observed between Nutrition (SD = 0.85) and Engineering (SD = 0.45).

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education offers a potential solution to the scalability of personalized learning, yet empirical frameworks connecting diagnostic data with teacher-mediated interventions remain limited in developing contexts. This study adopts a sequential multi-phase research design to address this gap. Phase 1 comprised a diagnostic quantitative analysis of the National Survey on Access and Permanence in Education (ENAPE 2021), involving a representative sample of 3422 Mexican undergraduate students. Using Exploratory Factor Analysis (KMO = 0.96) and Pearson correlations, the study established a structural baseline. Phase 2 implemented a quasi-experimental exploratory pilot (N = 23) across two academic clusters (Civil Engineering and Nutrition) using “ActivAI”, a custom GPT configured with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Results from Phase 1 revealed a strong, statistically significant correlation (r=0.72, p<0.01) between the perceived impact of education on daily life and the perception of equity, identifying “relevance” as a key driver of accessibility. Phase 2 results demonstrated high student satisfaction with AI-driven personalization (M = 4.49, SD = 0.64), although disciplinary variations in engagement were observed (SD = 0.85 in Nutrition versus 0.45 in Engineering). The study concludes by proposing the Dynamic Integration Model, which leverages AI not as a replacement for instruction but as a scalability toolkit for teacher-led orchestration, ensuring that personalization addresses dynamic student needs rather than static learning styles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hernández-Herrera et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69671985c0d1e3cfbfce8d6fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Trends, Benefits, and Challenges2025 · 202 citations
  2. 2Enhancing Student Engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s Power in Hybrid Education—A Review Analysis2023 · 240 citations
  3. 3Experimental evidence on learning using low-tech when school is out2022 · 100 citations
  4. 4A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour2024 · 709 citations
  5. 5Towards hybrid human‐AI learning technologies2022 · 298 citations