Key result
Exenatide ER lowers HbA1c by ~0.3% vs placebo in T1D patients with detectable C-peptide.
Why the study?
To evaluate whether a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist improves glucose control in type 1 diabetes, whether residual beta cell function affects response, and whether it alters beta cell function.
Does exenatide extended release improve HbA1c levels at 24 weeks in patients with type 1 diabetes?
Does exenatide extended release improve HbA1c levels at 24 weeks in patients with type 1 diabetes?
Exenatide extended release provides transient improvements in glycemic control and weight in type 1 diabetes, particularly in those with residual beta cell function, but these benefits are not sustained at 24 weeks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exenatide ER yields only transient HbA1c reduction in C-peptide-positive type 1 diabetes; leaves open whether sustained GLP-1 agonism merits larger trials.
Aims To test whether a long‐acting GLP‐1 receptor agonist would improve glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to determine whether the presence of residual beta cell function would affect the response. In addition, we sought to determine whether the drug would affect beta cell function. Methods We performed a randomized placebo‐controlled trial of exenatide extended release (ER) in participants with T1D with and without detectable levels of C‐peptide. Seventy‐nine participants were randomized to exenatide ER 2 mcg weekly, or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of detectable C‐peptide levels. The primary outcome was the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 24 weeks. Participants were followed for another 6 months off study drug. Results At week 24, the time of the primary outcome, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c level was 7.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.42, 8.10) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.0% (95% CI 7.64, 8.35) in the placebo group ( P = 0.08). At week 12 the LS mean HbA1c levels were 7.71% (95% CI 7.37, 8.05) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.05% (95% CI 7.7, 8.4) in the placebo group ( P = 0.01). The improvement at week 12 was driven mainly by those with detectable levels of C‐peptide. Those treated with exenatide ER lost weight at 12 and 24 weeks compared to those treated with placebo ( P <0.001 and P = 0.007). The total insulin dose was lower, but not when corrected for body weight, and was not affected by residual insulin production. Adverse events were more frequent with exenatide ER, but hypoglycaemia was not increased. Conclusion Treatment with exenatide ER may have short‐term benefits in some individuals with T1D who are overweight or who have detectable levels of C‐peptide, but short‐term improvements were not sustained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herold et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: