Fast-growing invasive tree species management produces a significant amount of low-density and low-value biomass, which offers a chance for waste valorization in the environmentally friendly construction sector. This study examines the utilization potential of low-value natural waste materials of tree bark, obtained from invasive hardwood species, in the production of environmentally friendly building mortars. More specifically, this study focuses on mixing bark powder of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) and tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima (Miller) Swingle), with two commercial commonly found lime-based mortar powders in five different ratios of bark content (0%, 5%, 10%, 20% and 30%) characterizing the produced composites, in terms of physical, hygroscopic and mechanical properties. Slightly lighter composites were created with the use of bark additives especially at the bark content of 20% and 30%. As regards the compressive strength, the bark shares of 10% and 20% exhibited the most beneficial performance among those studied, though only the weaker performance of mortar type (M1) benefited significantly from bark incorporation. For both mortars, the composites containing black locust bark presented higher resistance to compression strength and elasticity, demonstrating higher composite integration in general and milder, plastic fraction in relation to tree-of-heaven bark-based specimens, the properties of which are considered crucial for the durability of structural materials. However, black locust bark exhibited higher water absorption compared to tree-of-heaven-based specimens. Despite the drawback of higher hygroscopicity, the results show that black locust bark, especially at lower incorporation rates (10–20%), is a promising functional additive for generating lighter, more ductile mortars, supporting the creation of novel building materials and sustainable waste management.
KAMPERIDOU et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: