Key result
Carotid intraluminal thrombus linked to ~8.1-fold higher odds of ipsilateral ischemic stroke in nonstenotic disease.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,407)
Single-blind
Yes
Secondary analysis identifies stroke risk linked to nonstenotic carotid disease features, suggesting new evaluation approaches.
Background Symptomatic nonstenotic (<50% stenosis) carotid disease in the presence of high‐risk plaque features is a potential cause of ischemic stroke. We assessed stroke risk associated with symptomatic nonstenotic carotid disease. Methods This cross‐sectional secondary analysis of the AcT (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase) randomized controlled trial evaluated baseline computed tomography angiograms for degree of internal carotid artery stenosis, plaque features and the presence of intraluminal thrombi, webs, dissection, and rim sign. Stroke location was evaluated on 24‐hour follow‐up imaging. At a carotid level, mixed‐effects logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex, with patient identity as a random effect, examined associations between “concordant stroke” (ipsilateral acute stroke in the internal carotid artery territory) and symptomatic nonstenotic carotid disease. Results Of 1577 patients enrolled, 1407 (89.2%) with interpretable imaging were included: 329 (23.4%) had no carotid disease, 869 (61.8%) had nonstenotic carotid disease, and 209 (14.9%) had stenotic (≥50%) carotid disease in either the left or right internal carotid artery. Median age was 73 years (interquartile range, 63–83), with 48% female patients. Among 2519 (89.5%) internal carotid arteries with nonstenotic disease, 689 (27.4%) concordant strokes were identified. Intraluminal thrombi, carotid webs, carotid dissections, and carotid rim sign were significantly associated with concordant stroke (adjusted odds ratio, 8.11 [95% CI, 1.60–41.08]; adjusted odds ratio, 3.58 [95% CI, 1.53–8.35]; adjusted odds ratio, 6.77 [95% CI, 1.72–26.75]; and adjusted odds ratio, 3.17 [95% CI, 1.39–7.23], respectively). Results remained unchanged after excluding patients with atrial fibrillation and lacunar infarctions. Conclusions Features other than the degree of stenosis should be considered when evaluating patients with carotid disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ignacio et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute ischemic stroke and nonstenotic carotid disease (n=1,407). High-risk carotid plaque features (specifically intraluminal thrombi) vs. Absence of high-risk plaque features was evaluated on Concordant stroke (ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke in the internal carotid artery territory) (aOR 8.11, 95% CI 1.60-41.08). In patients with nonstenotic (<50%) carotid disease, intraluminal thrombi (aOR 8.11), carotid webs, dissections, and rim signs were significantly associated with ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: