Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Umbrella review synthesizes evidence on rebamipide's efficacy in gastrointestinal disorders, indicating its therapeutic benefits.
Objective: This umbrella review aimed to synthesize evidence from meta-analyses on the efficacy of rebamipide in major gastrointestinal disorders and dyspeptic symptoms. Methods: This umbrella review followed Joanna Briggs Institute standards and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251185686). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus (1 January 1985, to 10 September 2025) was conducted to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing rebamipide therapy. Methodological quality was appraised using AMSTAR-2, ROBIS, and GRADE tools. Pooled data were analyzed using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity, as assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: Eleven meta-analyses (88 primary studies) were included. Rebamipide significantly improved H. pylori eradication (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.44–2.16), reduced NSAID-induced mucosal injury (OR = 2.72; 95% CI: 1.89–5.14), enhanced ulcer healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection (OR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.42–3.65), and alleviated dyspeptic symptoms (OR = 2.95; 95% CI: 1.04–8.37). Overall evidence quality was moderate to high, with low to moderate risk of bias. Conclusions: Rebamipide demonstrates consistent therapeutic benefits across diverse gastrointestinal disorders, improving H. pylori eradication rates, mucosal protection, ulcer healing, and symptom relief. These findings support rebamipide as an effective and well-tolerated adjunctive agent for the prevention and management of upper gastrointestinal diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: