Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This case study demonstrates effective control of surface subsidence in coal mining through filling rate and support optimization, indicating a sustainable practice.
As a key sustainable green-mining technology, ultra-high-water backfill mining is widely used to control surface subsidence and sustain extraction of constrained coal seams. Focusing on the Hengjian coal mine in the Handan mining area, this study uses physical modeling and industrial tests to clarify surface subsidence under different filling rates and identify the rock layers that hydraulic supports must control at various equivalent mining heights. A method is proposed to improve the filling rate by optimizing the thickness of the hydraulic support canopy through topological analysis. Results show that, compared with a filling rate of 85%, a 90% filling rate reduces subsidence of the basic roof, key layer, and surface by 51%, 57%, and 63%, respectively, while the industrial practice results have verified that the filling rate can significantly control surface subsidence. The equivalent mining height thresholds for instability of the immediate roof and high basic roof at the 2515 working face are 0.44 m and 1.26 m. Reducing the trailing beam thickness by 10 cm can theoretically raise the filling rate of the 2515 working face by about 2%, offering guidance for similar mines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: