PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Search for a cH signal in the associated production of at least one charm quark with a Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at s=13 TeV

View Full Paper
CCCMS CollaborationVCV. ChekhovskyAHA. Hayrapetyan

Key Points

  • The research aims to detect the charm quark's interaction with the Higgs boson through its decay to two photons.
  • Conducted a search for a charm-Higgs signal in proton-proton collisions.
  • Utilized data from the CMS experiment at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV.
  • Applied standard model rates for predicting Higgs boson production processes.
  • Measured the signal strength and coupling modifiers at a 95% confidence level.
  • Observed upper limit on cH signal strength is 243 times the standard model prediction.
  • Expected upper limit on cH signal strength is 355 times the standard model prediction.
  • Observed allowed interval on the charm quark coupling modifier |κc| is < 38.1.
  • Expected allowed interval on the charm quark coupling modifier |κc| is < 72.5.

Abstract

This paper presents the first search for a cH signal sensitive to the coupling of the charm quark (c) to the Higgs boson (H) in the associated production of at least one charm quark with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons. The results are based on a data set of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected with the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb^−1. Assuming the standard model (SM) rates for all other Higgs boson production processes, the observed (expected) upper limit at 95% confidence level on the cH signal strength is 243 (355) times the SM prediction. Under the same assumption, the observed (expected) allowed interval on the Higgs boson to charm quark coupling modifier, κc, is |κc| < 38. 1 (|κc| < 72. 5) at 95% confidence level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Collaboration et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6969d468940543b9777094adhttps://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000189619
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper