Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes advances in n-type doping strategies and stability for carbon nanotube thermoelectric materials, suggesting implications for performance enhancement.
The quest for high-performance, flexible thermoelectric (TE) materials has spurred considerable interest in carbon nanotube (CNT)-based systems. Efficient CNT based devices require both p- and n-type CNT-based TE materials, however, the performance and stability of n-type CNTs are far behind those of p-type. Effective n-type doping strategies are crucial for advancing the development of CNT-based TE materials. This review comprehensively summarizes recent advances in n-type CNT-based TEs, covering the structure-performance relationship, n-type doping strategies, and stability issues and strategies. The doping strategies are systematically summarized and categorized into alkali/alkaline earth metals, organic dopants and ionic dopants. More importantly, the mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of each doping avenue are thoroughly analyzed to offer guidance for developing high-efficiency n-type CNT-based TEs. In addition, the intrinsic instability issues of n-type CNTs are carefully discussed alongside emerging solutions, including various encapsulation methods and the intrinsic self-protection mechanisms of CNTs. Finally, the discussion extends beyond material synthesis to device-level integration, expounding how these chemical strategies can enhance output performance and mechanical durability in power generation modules. Through the systematic analysis spanning structure-property correlations, doping strategies, comparative studies, and stability assessments, the review aims to highlight the most promising directions for achieving long-term robust and high-performance n-type CNT-based TEs. The insights presented herein are expected to catalyze further innovation and accelerate the evolution of CNT-based TEs for next-generation energy harvesting applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: