Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article critiques individualism and dichotomies in the criminal legal system, suggesting new perspectives for justice.
This article critiques the Western criminal legal systems’ individualism and reliance on dichotomies. Grounding our analysis in micro-level findings based on interviews from two studies on the experiences of repeatedly criminalised people in the UK, we aim to show how these dichotomies – criminal/non-criminal behaviour; guilt/innocence at event level; victim/offender flatten reality beyond recognition and allow individual(s) to be blamed and punished. In doing so, this paper seeks to create space beyond the societal ‘captive mind’, which uncritically accepts this version of criminal ‘justice’ as the right way to respond to ‘offending’. Drawing on decolonization thought and non-state justice mechanisms, it joins calls for different ways of seeing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schinkel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: