Background/Objectives: Oral function impairment negatively impacts nutrition, health, and quality of life in older adults. While retaining ≥20 natural teeth is often recommended for maintaining oral function, its validity is uncertain, particularly for those who adapt to tooth loss with dentures. This study aimed to determine the minimum number of remaining functional teeth necessary to prevent oral hypofunction in older adults, focusing on two diagnostic criteria: decreased masticatory function and reduced occlusal force. Methods: A total of 154 participants (≥60 years) were included. Oral examination assessed the number of remaining functional teeth. To assess masticatory function, masticatory performance was objectively measured using a visual scoring method of gummy jelly, and occlusal force was quantified with pressure-sensitive film. Pearson’s correlation analyzed relationships among variables, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal tooth number cut-offs for detecting decreased masticatory function (score ≤ 2) and reduced occlusal force (<500 N). Results: Significant positive correlations were found between the number of remaining functional teeth and both masticatory performance (r = 0.591, p < 0.001) and occlusal force (r = 0.453, p < 0.001). ROC indicated that 17 teeth was the optimal threshold for identifying both decreased masticatory performance and reduced occlusal force, with sensitivities of 0.79 and 0.72 and specificities of 0.93 and 0.88, respectively. Conclusions: Retaining at least 17 teeth appears sufficient to preserve oral function in older adults. Retention of 17 or more remaining functional teeth may be sufficient to maintain adequate masticatory performance and occlusal force. These findings serves as a preliminary guide for treatment planning and targeted interventions focused on preserving tooth retention and improving oral function in aging populations.
Suwanarpa et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: