Synthetic jets, generated through the periodic suction and ejection of fluid without net mass addition, offer distinct benefits, such as compactness, ease of integration, and independence from external fluid sources. These characteristics make them well-suited for flow control and convective heat transfer applications. However, conventional single-actuator configurations are constrained by limited jet formation, narrow surface coverage, and diminished effectiveness in the far field. This review critically evaluates the key limitations and explores four advanced configurations developed to mitigate them: dual-cavity synthetic jets, single-actuator multi-orifice jets, coaxial synthetic jets, and synthetic jet arrays. Dual-cavity synthetic jets enhance volume flow rate and surface coverage by generating multiple vortices and enabling jet vectoring, though they remain constrained by downstream vortex diffusion. Single-actuator multi-orifice designs enhance near-field heat transfer through multiple interacting vortices, yet far-field performance remains an issue. Coaxial synthetic jets improve vortex dynamics and overall performance but face challenges at high Reynolds numbers. Synthetic jet arrays with independently controlled actuators offer the greatest potential, enabling jet vectoring and focusing to enhance entrainment, expand spanwise coverage, and improve far-field performance. By examining key limitations and technological advances, this review lays the foundation for expanded use of synthetic jets in practical engineering applications.
Pasa et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: