Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This assessment identifies PFAS levels in urban river waters, indicating environmental quality concerns.
This study presents the first comprehensive assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface waters of northern Serbia (Middle Danube region), combining targeted analysis of 25 PFAS with high-resolution mass spectrometry suspect screening (SSA) at 12 settlement-adjacent sites on major rivers and part of the Danube–Tisa–Danube (DTD) canal network. The sum of 10 quantified PFAS showed pronounced spatial variability: the Great Bačka Canal (GBC) exhibited the highest mean and maximum values (18.4 ng/L and 52.6 ng/L, respectively); the Danube averaged 9.05 ng/L (2.92–22.2 ng/L); the Tisa averaged 10.5 ng/L (4.53–16.5 ng/L); and the Sava and Tamiš exhibited the lowest means (~5.4 ng/L each). In total, 19 of 24 sites exceeded the proposed EU group Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) of 4.4 ng/L, expressed as PFOA-equivalents, with exceedances of 5.4–20.2 ng/L; PFOS exceeded the 0.65 ng/L inland surface water annual average (AA) EQS in 17 samples. SSA expanded coverage beyond targets, revealing ultra-/short-chain PFAS and replacements, with TFA as the most abundant (337–1165 ng/L; mean 513 ng/L) and notable maxima for PFPrA (51.3 ng/L), ADONA (24.9 ng/L), and TFMS (11.2 ng/L). Compared with European freshwaters, the maximum obtained here lies in the lower-mid part of the reported range, consistent with short-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCA) dominance and diffuse-source influences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: