Retrospective cohort study identifies optimal ablation margins in small liver tumors, indicating individualized treatment strategies.
Background and aims: Standardized quantitative criteria are lacking for the recommended circumferential thermal ablative margin in liver malignancies ≤3 cm. This study aimed to identify predictors of technical success in thermal ablation and develop a predictive model defining optimal ablation margins. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 979 patients undergoing computed tomography-guided radiofrequency or microwave ablation for liver malignancies ≤3 cm. Using a radiotherapy treatment planning system, preoperative tumor dimensions [maximum tumor area, preoperative maximum tumor area (PreMTA); tumor volume, preoperative tumor volume (PreTV)] and postoperative ablation characteristics [maximum ablation area, postoperative maximum ablation area (Post-MAA); ablation volume, postoperative ablation volume (PostAV)] were volumetrically quantified. Volume ratio (PostAV/PreTV) and area ratio (PostMAA/PreMTA) were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of residual tumor. A nomogram was developed and validated using Harrell’s C-index, calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Size- and location-specific margin recommendations were derived mathematically. Results: Residual tumor occurred in 91 patients (9.3%). Multivariate analysis identified adjacent large vessel [odd ratio (OR) = 1.97; P = 0.015], larger PreMTA (OR = 1.44; P = 0.014), and lower volume ratio (OR = 0.77; P = 0.009) as independent predictors. For non-perivascular tumors, optimal volume ratios were 4.3, 6.0, and 8.8 (corresponding Δ R = 0.3 cm, 0.8 cm, 1.6 cm) for diameters 1.0 cm, 2.0 cm, and 3.0 cm, respectively. A web-based calculator was implemented (https://fbzl.org/monitor/ablation_model.html). Conclusions: This study establishes and validates a computational model defining tumor size- and vessel proximity-specific optimal ablation margins for liver malignancies ≤3 cm. The web-accessible model provides evidence-based individualized ablation targets that optimize oncological efficacy while preserving parenchyma, replacing conventional fixed margins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: