In patients with EF<50% and GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2, all-cause mortality is 5.2 times and cardiovascular mortality 7.18 times higher than those with GFR>60 ml/min/1.73 m2.
How does renal function impact LVEF recovery and long-term mortality in patients following acute coronary syndrome?
In patients post-ACS, those with CKD≥C3a do not show significant LVEF improvement within a year and have markedly higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to those with preserved renal function, regardless of baseline LVEF.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Objective. To analyze ejection fraction depending on renal function and its relationship with long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Material and methods. The study included 1.607 patients (mean age 63.8±12.1 years, 64.9% men) discharged between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. All ones underwent treatment for ACS. The authors analyzed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD≥C3a and without significant renal impairment. The median follow-up was 42.3 32.5; 48.4 months. Results. In patients with CKD≥C3a, EF increased only by 1.1% -4.8; 11 (p=0.07) within a year, in patients with GFR>60 ml/min/1.73 m2 — by 7.1% 0.4; 14.1 (p60 ml/min/1.73 m2. All-cause mortality rate in patients with preserved LVEF was 6.53 times (95% CI 2.94—14.51) higher and cardiovascular mortality rate was 6.91 times (95% CI 2.34—20.4) higher in patients with GFR60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Conclusion. In patients with CKD≥C3a, LVEF does not significantly increase within a year after ACS. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality rate in patients with CKD≥C3a and different LVEFs are comparable, whereas these values increase inversely proportional to EF decrease in patients without severe renal impairment.
Shchinova et al. (Tue,) reported a other. In patients with EF<50% and GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2, all-cause mortality is 5.2 times and cardiovascular mortality 7.18 times higher than those with GFR>60 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: