PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Annals of Surgery Open1 citationsOpen Access

William Halsted’s Radical Mastectomy Patients: A Historical Analysis Through Patient Narratives

View Full Paper
CBChristina M Bear

Key Points

  • This article aims to explore the experiences of patients who underwent radical mastectomies performed by William Halsted.
  • Analyzed correspondence between Halsted and his patients and their families.
  • Used primary sources from the Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives.
  • Employed a patient-centered approach to historical surgery analysis.
  • Patients reported significant issues including arm movement restrictions and arm swelling.
  • Concerns included chronic pain and anxiety about cancer recurrence.
  • Highlighting a disconnect between Halsted's surgical outcomes and patients' perceived quality of life.

Abstract

The radical mastectomy—a surgery pioneered by William Stewart Halsted at The Johns Hopkins Hospital—was the gold standard surgical treatment for breast cancer until the late 20th century. The procedure included the removal of the breast and lymph nodes, as well as the pectoral muscles. The medical debate surrounding the radical mastectomy is well documented in medical journals and secondary historical sources. Also well documented are Halsted’s life, surgical innovations, and his long-standing struggle with addiction. Yet, the experiences of Halsted’s patients who underwent this procedure remain relatively unexplored. This article utilizes a patient-centered approach to the history of surgery and Halsted by exploring the experiences of Halsted’s patients who underwent radical mastectomies. By analyzing correspondence between Halsted and his patients and family available at the Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives, this article argues that there was a disconnect between what Halsted and his patients considered a cure after the radical mastectomy. Patients wrote to Halsted about restrictions in arm movement, arm swelling, pain, worries about recurrence, and doubts about the surgery. These concerns—which can be tied to current concerns in surgery like patients’ quality of life, chronic pain, and lymphedema—show that, despite Halsted’s favorable view of the surgery, patients might have seen things differently.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christina M Bear (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2616d2a12237a934967fhttps://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000651
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper