Explores how humanitarian practitioners respond to overlapping climate and conflict-induced displacement in the Philippines, highlighting critical challenges.
Disasters, conflict, and climate change increasingly intersect, forcing communities to flee and trapping them in cycles of displacement. Yet, humanitarian responses remain fragmented, often addressing displacement crises in isolation. This study explores how humanitarian practitioners in the Philippines navigate the overlap of climate-induced and conflict-induced displacement – what we term “complex displacement”. Drawing on 32 semi-structured interviews with humanitarian practitioners, we examine how displacement is classified and the factors that shape organisational decisions to respond. We identify that humanitarians rely on trigger-based, temporal, spatial, and precedent-based classifications of displacement. We also uncover four major factors influencing responses (or the lack thereof) – government requests, operational presence, security, and logistics. Our findings reveal structural blind spots that hinder effective response to complex displacement, and we call for a rethinking of humanitarian systems to address overlapping drivers of displacement. Grounded in the Philippines, these insights offer broader relevance for countries grappling with converging climate-induced and conflict-induced risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
See et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: