PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Journal Of Clinical Periodontology2 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of Biologics for Surgical Treatment of Periodontal Suprabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials

View Full Paper
SBSahar BaniameriPHParham HazratiHSHamoun Sabri

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the effectiveness of biologics combined with open flap debridement in treating suprabony defects.
  • Conducted a systematic literature search for controlled trials.
  • Included trials focused on adult patients with horizontal periodontal defects.
  • Primary outcome measured was residual probing depth.
  • Performed random-effects meta-analyses and assessed heterogeneity and risk of bias.
  • Included nine studies with a total of 303 patients.
  • Biologics like enamel matrix derivative and platelet-rich fibrin significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to open flap debridement alone.
  • Pooled mean differences for residual probing depth were −0.89 mm for EMD and −0.42 mm for PRF.
  • Clinical attachment levels also improved, with differences of −1.32 mm for EMD and −0.69 mm for PRF.
  • High heterogeneity was present, and evidence quality ranged from low to very low.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Limited bone support in suprabony defects hinders predictable regeneration, but adjunctive biologics can improve results. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjunctive biologics combined with open flap debridement (OFD) compared with OFD alone when treating suprabony defects. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify controlled trials evaluating adult patients presenting horizontal periodontal defects. The primary outcome included residual probing depth (PD). Random‐effects meta‐analyses were performed; heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics; risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane RoB‐2; and evidence of quality was appraised via the GRADE framework. Results Nine studies comprising 303 patients were included. Adjunctive use of biologics—including enamel matrix derivative (EMD), platelet‐rich fibrin (PRF) and hyaluronic acid (HA)—significantly enhanced clinical outcomes compared to OFD alone, with pooled mean differences favouring EMD and PRF for both residual PD (−0.89 and −0.42 mm) and clinical attachment level (CAL) (−1.32 and −0.69 mm). While subgroup differences were observed, notably with EMD, high heterogeneity was present for CAL and PD, and evidence of certainty ranged from low to very low. Conclusion Adjunctive biologics improve clinical outcomes in suprabony periodontal defects; however, rigorous standardised trials are needed for reaching firm conclusions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baniameri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b26b2d2a12237a934a075https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70078
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Healing of Periodontal Suprabony Defects following Treatment with Open Flap Debridement with or without Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Application2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Five years clinical results following treatment of human intra-bony defects with an enamel matrix derivative: A randomized controlled trial2012 · 25 citations
  3. 3Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference or standardized mean difference?2014 · 401 citations
  4. 4Regenerative surgical treatment of furcation defects: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials2019 · 125 citations
  5. 5Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect2019 · 900 citations