Systematic review identifies cost control tools in healthcare, suggesting improvements for policy and practice.
The growing economic pressures on healthcare systems have heightened the need for effective and sustainable cost management strategies. This study presents a PRISMA-based systematic review of 210 peer-reviewed articles published between 1974 and 2024, retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Following a structured selection and screening process, the articles were analysed to identify dominant cost control tools, contextual applications, and methodological trends across diverse health systems. The findings highlight a strong prevalence of Activity-Based Costing (ABC), Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG), and benchmarking practices, predominantly in public hospital settings. However, significant thematic gaps remain, particularly concerning low-income countries, interdisciplinary integration, and the evaluation of digital technologies for financial optimisation. This review provides a comprehensive thematic synthesis of international research, consolidating knowledge in healthcare cost management and offering evidence-based recommendations to guide future empirical research, policy design, and strategic planning in health finance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: