This retrospective cohort study examines surgical outcomes of facial trauma from e-scooter and e-bike injuries, highlighting potential complications.
Facial fracture surgery aims to restore function and facial form while minimizing morbidity; however, late complications may still arise. With the growing use of electric scooters and e-bikes, the epidemiology of facial trauma has shifted, requiring updated characterization. This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent operative repair of facial fractures at a tertiary maxillofacial trauma center between 2017 and 2022. Demographic features, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, treatment modality, and 6-month postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 254 surgically managed patients were included (mean age 30.9±14.4 years; 56.7% male). Micro-mobility trauma accounted for 50.8% of cases and was associated predominantly with mandibular and condylar fractures, frequently managed with closed treatment or combined IMF-based approaches. In contrast, other mechanisms more commonly resulted in midfacial fractures treated with ORIF. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications were rare (0.8% each), whereas late complications occurred in 5.1% of patients, most frequently temporomandibular dysfunction, malocclusion, neurosensory disturbance, or infection. Concomitant soft-tissue injury was significantly associated with late complications ( P =0.042), and late complications were more frequent following ORIF-only procedures, though this did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.06). These findings indicate that while contemporary surgical management of facial fractures is generally safe, late complications remain clinically meaningful. Micro-mobility trauma has emerged as a dominant mechanism shaping fracture distribution and treatment selection, though not overall complication rates. Patients with soft-tissue injury and those undergoing ORIF may benefit from closer postoperative surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aharon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: