What question did this study set out to answer?

The research aims to analyze the EU's role in shaping human rights norms and propose enhancements to judicial reviews of EU law.

Towards a systematic and explicit legitimate aims test in human rights challenges to EU entities

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

This article explores a systematic approach to enhance human rights protections in the EU, suggesting improved judicial reviews of EU legislation.

The research aims to analyze the EU's role in shaping human rights norms and propose enhancements to judicial reviews of EU law.
Analyzed the implications of the Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation on human rights.
Reviewed existing legal frameworks and mechanisms for human rights challenges in the EU.
Argued for an expanded application of Article 52(1) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Established that the legitimate aims test can enhance judicial reviews of human rights.
Proposed that treating the legitimate aims test as distinct from proportionality improves legal assessments.
Identified procedural constraints that hinder effective human rights protection under EU law.

Joyce De Coninck (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This article explores a systematic approach to enhance human rights protections in the EU, suggesting improved judicial reviews of EU legislation.