Key result
AI-assisted echocardiography identifies HCM with a pooled AUC of 0.96.
Why the study?
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains underdiagnosed due to overlapping echocardiographic characteristics and subjective interpretations.
Does artificial intelligence-assisted echocardiography accurately identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does artificial intelligence-assisted echocardiography accurately identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Artificial intelligence-assisted echocardiography demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for identifying hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, highlighting its potential to improve clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports AI-assisted echocardiography for HCM detection; confirms consensus and extends pooled diagnostic evidence.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common genetic cardiac disease, remains underdiagnosed most of the time due to overlapping echocardiographic characteristics and subjective interpretations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted echocardiography interpretations for identifying HCM and to explore factors contributing to variability and validity. After a comprehensive search through various databases, eligible studies reporting diagnostic metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, or area under the curve (AUC) were included into our analyses. Data were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified with the I 2 statistic. Twenty-five studies were included into our meta-analysis. The pooled AUC for AI-based echocardiographic detection of HCM was 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90–0.95]. After trim-and-fill correction, the pooled AUC increased to 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97). Overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83–0.93) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76–0.94), respectively. Meta-regression revealed that convolutional neural network, support vector machine, and ensemble learning algorithms exhibited variable performance, with convolutional neural network-based models favoring higher sensitivity. We demonstrated that AI-based models evaluating echocardiographic data could be an accurate diagnostic tool for HCM. This highlights the potential of recent advancements to improve clinical decision-making.
Shojaei et al. (2026) studied this question. AI-assisted echocardiography demonstrated a pooled AUC of 0.96 for identifying hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.87.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: