PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026American Journal of Dermatopathology2 citations

Primary Cutaneous Ewing Sarcoma With Unusual Features: Potential Mimic of Merkel Cell Carcinoma

View Full Paper
IHIhar HaidukTDTatiana E. DakhtlerPKPolina R. Khaibullina

Key Points

  • This investigation aims to clarify the diagnostic challenges posed by primary cutaneous Ewing sarcoma, which can mimic Merkel cell carcinoma.
  • Case report of a 73-year-old woman with a nodular tumor on the arm
  • Initial punch biopsy and subsequent wide local excision performed
  • Histological and immunohistochemical analyses conducted on the excised tissue
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization used for molecular confirmation
  • Immunohistochemistry showed positivity for CD99 and NKX2.2, with S100 and SOX10 negative
  • FISH analysis confirmed the presence of an EWSR1::FLI1 gene fusion
  • The sentinel lymph node was free of metastasis
  • The case highlighted the diagnostic overlap and challenges between PCES and MCC

Abstract

Abstract: Primary Cutaneous Ewing Sarcoma (PCES) is exceptionally rare and represent a notorious diagnostic mimicker of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), particularly when it aberrantly expresses neuroendocrine markers. This pitfall can lead to significant diagnostic error and inappropriate management. A 73-year-old woman presented with a progressive, FDG-avid nodule on the left upper arm. An initial punch biopsy revealed a malignant small round cell tumor with a classic neuroendocrine immunophenotype, including dot-like positivity for CK20 and Neurofilament, which did not allow distinction between PCES and MCC. Subsequently, wide local excision was performed. Histological and extensive immunohistochemical analyses were conducted on the excision specimen, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was employed for molecular confirmation. Examination of the resectate showed a multinodular dermal tumor composed of uniform round cells. Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse positivity for CD99 and NKX2.2, whereas S100 and SOX10 were negative. Crucially, FISH analysis confirmed an EWSR1::FLI1 gene fusion. The sentinel lymph node was negative for metastasis. This case exemplifies a profound diagnostic pitfall in which PCES closely mimicked the immunoprofile of MCC. It underscores that dot-like CK20 and Neurofilament staining are not entirely pathognomonic for MCC diagnosis. In the differential diagnosis of cutaneous round cell tumors, which includes metastases, melanoma, and several sarcoma types, the present case reveals the diagnostic challenges of cutaneous sarcomas and highlights the necessity of a multimodal approach for accurate diagnosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haiduk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77d4eb60fb80d1396199https://doi.org/10.1097/dad.0000000000003218
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper