Comparative adaptation analysis reveals federated learning potential for privacy and scalability in ITS applications.
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) have progressively incorporated machine learning to optimize traffic efficiency, enhance safety, and improve real-time decision-making. However, the traditional centralized machine learning (ML) paradigm faces critical limitations regarding data privacy, scalability, and single-point vulnerabilities. This study explores FL as a decentralized alternative that preserves privacy by training local models without transferring raw data. Based on a systematic literature review encompassing 39 ITS-related studies, this work classifies applications according to their architectural detail—distinguishing systems from models—and identifies three families of federated learning (FL) frameworks: privacy-focused, integrable, and advanced infrastructure. Three representative frameworks—Federated Learning-based Gated Recurrent Unit (FedGRU), Digital Twin + Hierarchical Federated Learning (DT + HFL), and Transfer Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (TFL-CNN)—were comparatively analyzed against a client–server baseline to assess their suitability for ITS adaptation. Our qualitative, architecture-level comparison suggests that DT + HFL and TFL-CNN, characterized by hierarchical aggregation and edge-level coordination, are conceptually better aligned with scalability and stability requirements in vehicular and traffic deployments than pure client–server baselines. FedGRU, while conceptually relevant as a meta-framework for coordinating multiple organizational models, is primarily intended as a complementary reference rather than as a standalone architecture for large-scale ITS deployment. Through application-level evaluations—including traffic prediction, accident detection, transport-mode identification, and driver profiling—this study demonstrates that FL can be effectively integrated into ITS with moderate architectural adjustments. This work does not introduce new experimental results; instead, it provides a qualitative, architecture-level comparison and adaptation guideline to support the migration of ITS applications toward federated learning. Overall, the results establish a solid methodological foundation for migrating centralized ITS architectures toward federated, privacy-preserving intelligence, in alignment with the evolution of edge and 6G infrastructures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: