PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Orbis Litterarum0 citationsOpen Access

Autofiction as relational mediation: A Ghost in the Throat and To Write as if Already Dead

View Full Paper
SCStijn De CauwerLeiden University

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how autofiction navigates neoliberalism and fosters a sense of relational writing.
  • Analyzes two autofiction works: 'A Ghost in the Throat' and 'To Write as if Already Dead'
  • Considers the authors' negotiation with neoliberal pressures
  • Explores connections to historical writers and their struggles
  • Both authors reflect on their creative processes amid neoliberal commodification
  • Demonstrates the potential of autofiction to foster community through shared experiences
  • Zambreno critiques traditional autofiction conventions and the publishing industry's demands

Abstract

Abstract Because of its exploration of the self and the resemblance to online styles of publishing, autofiction has been accused by certain scholars of reflecting neoliberal tendencies. Hans Demeyer and Sven Vitse have developed a more nuanced view on the relation between autofiction and neoliberalism. Autofiction can be a place where authors try to negotiate the paradox of wanting to produce creative work in times when our cognitive and affective capacities are relentlessly commodified. In this article, two recent books, A Ghost in the Throat (2020) by Doireann Ní Ghríofa and To Write as if Already Dead (2021) by Kate Zambreno, will be discussed as strategies to cope with the pressure of living in a neoliberal context and to develop a more relational form of writing. In both works, the authors attempt to attune to the voices and lives of other writers: Eibhlín Dubh Ní Chonaill, Hervé Guibert, and others. Exploring affinities between the lives of these writers and their own, both de‐individualize their struggles and connect with a wider community of people who shared similar struggles. Furthermore, Zambreno explicitly problematizes the conventions of autofiction, as well as the compromises she is forced to make with the demands of publishers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stijn De Cauwer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c7817eb60fb80d13963f6https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.70026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rethinking Autofiction as a Global Practice: Trajectories of Anglophone Criticism from 2000 to 20202024 · 10 citations
  2. 2The Absolute Self(ie): How Autofiction Writes the Relational2019 · 3 citations
  3. 3Autofiction, Autotheory, and the Neoliberal Contemporary2022 · 4 citations
  4. 4“ This is a Female text ”: The Mediumship of Creative Histories in Doireann Ní Ghríofa’s A Ghost in the Throat2023 · 2 citations
  5. 5Sources of the Self(ie): An Introduction to the Study of Autofiction in English2019 · 11 citations