The standard system serves as a crucial foundation for promoting the standardized and high-quality development of sports-medicine integration. Currently, the development of sports-medicine integration in China remains in its exploratory stage, facing challenges such as the lack of cross-domain standards and an incomplete standard system architecture, which hinder its standardized and high-quality advancement. This study aims to analyze the connotation of the standard system in the field of sports-medicine integration, identify challenges in its construction, and propose targeted recommendations. A combination of literature review, logical analysis, field surveys, and statistical methods was employed to conduct theoretical and practical analyses on the connotation, significance, challenges, and recommendations for the standard system in sports-medicine integration. Statistical analysis involved retrieving published standards in this field from the "China Standards Information Public Service Platform," including data on the quantity, timing, levels, and administrative units of the standards. The standard system for sports-medicine integration is a systematically designed collection of standards or specifications that integrates technology development, service processes, facilities, personnel qualifications, data management, and other requirements in the interdisciplinary field of sports and healthcare, guided by current needs and future development goals. It serves as a blueprint for standardization efforts and a critical foundation for formulating and revising standards in this field. Three key challenges were identified: (1) The lack of interdepartmental coordination between sports and healthcare administrations leads to fragmented standard development. (2) A shortage of interdisciplinary professionals proficient in sports science, clinical medicine, and standardization creates barriers to standard research. (3) There is a critical deficiency in core technical standards, leaving essential domains of sports-medicine integration—such as service protocols, personnel certification, health risk evaluation, and wearable device data governance—without authoritative or implementable regulatory frameworks. Improving the standard system for sports-medicine integration is essential for its standardized and high-quality development. Recommendations include: (1) Establishing a technical organization for sports-medicine integration standardization and a cross-departmental collaborative governance mechanism to coordinate standard system construction. (2) Innovating interdisciplinary education models, strengthening talent cultivation, and building expert databases for standard development. (3) Implementing a "challenge-oriented" mechanism to prioritize the formulation of key standards, ensuring comprehensive service standards across the entire sports-medicine integration chain.
Wu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: