Key result
Cilostazol linked to an ~86% reduction in angina frequency in refractory vasospastic angina.
Why the study?
Randomized trials show cilostazol is efficacious in refractory VSA, but its use in real-world clinical practice remains limited.
Does cilostazol improve patient-reported outcomes in patients with refractory vasospastic angina?
Does cilostazol improve patient-reported outcomes in patients with refractory vasospastic angina?
In real-world clinical practice, cilostazol improves patient-reported angina frequency and quality of life in patients with refractory vasospastic angina.
Should not yet change practice in refractory vasospastic angina; leaves open cilostazol efficacy pending randomized trials.
Introduction Refractory vasospastic angina (VSA) includes patients with disabling angina despite maximally tolerated calcium channel blocker and nitrate therapy. Randomised clinical trial evidence confirms the efficacy of cilostazol in refractory VSA, yet its use in real-world clinical practice is limited. This study evaluated the impact of cilostazol therapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with refractory VSA. Methods Between June 2016 and May 2022, 15 consecutive refractory VSA patients were initiated on cilostazol (50mg twice daily), with baseline and 3-month responses assessed via the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The primary outcome was a clinically significant reduction in angina frequency (ie >10-point improvement in SAQ angina frequency score) at 3 months. Results A clinically significant reduction in angina frequency was reported in 13 patients (86%) at 3-months, with 3 (20%) becoming angina free. Moreover, over 3 months, median SAQ scores improved for angina frequency (25 [IQR 15,46] to 75 [30,82]), physical limitation (53 [44,67] to 83 [56,92]), and quality-of-life (17 [4,29] to 50 [35,58]). Additionally, a 54% reduction in angina-related emergency department presentations and 50% reduction in angina-related hospital admissions was noted. Minor medication-related adverse effects were experienced by 3 patients, with no serious adverse effects noted. Cilostazol was continued in 14 patients (93%) beyond the 3-month follow-up period. Conclusions In patients with refractory VSA, cilostazol is well tolerated, improves patient-reported outcomes, reduces healthcare utilisation, and thus is an effective therapy in real-world clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) studied this question. Cilostazol therapy resulted in an 86% reduction in angina frequency, with 20% of patients becoming angina-free after 3 months in those with refractory vasospastic angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: